President Bola Tinubu has instructed the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to lift a court order that froze an account belonging to the Osun State Government.
In a statement issued on Thursday, Tinubu expressed his discomfort not with the EFCC executing its court-mandated role, but with the timing of their actions. He has therefore ordered the EFCC to promptly seek a court’s permission to reverse the order and halt its actions against the Osun State Government.
Tinubu emphasized that rescinding the court order is crucial because actions by federal institutions often reflect on him as President, even if he wasn’t previously informed. Since taking office in May 2023, he has consistently advocated for anti-corruption and law enforcement agencies to carry out their duties independently and impartially, without political interference. He has intentionally avoided directing or meddling in the operations of the EFCC or similar agencies, believing robust democratic institutions are vital for good governance and rule of law.
While not fully briefed on the details, Tinubu noted that the timing of the EFCC’s action was inappropriate, especially with Osun State on the brink of its gubernatorial election. He stressed that nothing should suggest federal interference in the election process.
READ ALSO: Orji Kalu: ll Quit APC If Tinubu Disrespects Opposition, Catholic Church
On Tuesday, Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke reported that the EFCC froze one of the state’s accounts designated for paying workers’ salaries. He also claimed the agency planned to freeze accounts of some top officials. He called for accountability from the EFCC chairman regarding the freeze and labeled such actions as undermining democracy.
The EFCC defended its decision, citing suspicious fund movements in and out of the account as grounds for intervention. It stated this measure aligns with its responsibility to protect public resources and prevent misuse. The EFCC acknowledged the upcoming election but insisted it cannot neglect its duties due to electoral processes.
The move sparked debate, with some opposition leaders claiming it to be strategically timed considering the impending elections. Nonetheless, the EFCC maintained that allowing electoral concerns to hinder its legal functions would be unacceptable.
